logo
Welcome to Foothills Financial Planning, Inc.
  • Subscribe via RSS

  • 401k
  • 529 Plans
  • Annuities
  • Banking
  • Berkshire Hathaway
  • Camelback Fund
  • College Savings
  • Credit
  • Debt
  • Dividends
  • Emergency Fund
  • Estate Planning
  • Fiduciary Standard
  • General
  • General Personal Finance
  • Health Savings Accounts
  • Insurance
  • Investing
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement Planning
  • Spending
  • Stocks
  • Taxes
  • Twins and Triplets
  • 2012
    • March (1)
    • January (2)
  • 2011
    • December (2)
    • November (1)
    • October (3)
    • September (6)
    • August (8)
    • July (1)
    • June (3)
    • May (4)
    • April (2)
    • March (1)
    • February (4)
    • January (4)
  • 2010
    • December (5)
    • November (7)
    • October (5)
    • September (2)
    • August (3)
    • July (2)
    • June (3)
    • May (3)
    • April (2)
    • March (5)
    • February (4)
    • January (3)
  • 2009
    • December (1)
    • November (4)
    • October (2)
    • September (6)
    • August (2)
    • July (2)
    • June (2)
    • May (3)
    • April (3)
    • March (5)
    • February (4)
    • January (1)
  • 2008
    • December (2)
    • November (1)
    • September (1)
  • 2007
    • September (1)
    • February (2)
  • 2006
    • November (1)
    • September (1)
    • August (1)
    • January (1)
  • 2005
    • December (2)

Mayhem and Christmas

Monday, December 19, 2011

It's Christmastime, and while many of us are consumed with holiday celebrations, family gatherings and worship services, I'd like to share another entertaining reminder of what the unexpected can do if we're not well insured with a solid Emergency Fund.

Not an endorsement of Allstate Insurance Company.  I very much endorse Christmas.


Tags:

Emergency Fund | General Personal Finance | Insurance

E-mail | del.icio.us

Pull Your Finances together - CFP Board

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Tags: cfp

General Personal Finance

E-mail | del.icio.us

Bad week for investment bankers?

Thursday, September 01, 2011

One of the big news stories yesterday was that the Department of Justice scuttled AT&T's plan to buy T-Mobile. That's not entirely remarkable on the face of it, although it seems to come as a big surprise to AT&T. What is very eye-opening is the fact that AT&T is now on the hook for a $3 billion breakup fee as well as additional consideration to T-Mobile. In other words, if the deal doesn't go through AT&T must pay $3 billion for the privilege of having negotiated with them. To provide some perspective, AT&T paid about $9.9 billion in dividends* in 2010. They'll pay more this year, but...it's a big chunk of change.

Certainly, AT&T's management had to sign off on the terms of a breakup of the deal. A breakup fee is not unusual, and some consideration would have been necessary to achieve agreement on a deal. Nonetheless, couldn't have this been done for some lower level of consideration? How about a measly $1 billion. I'm no expert in this space, but did AT&T's investment bankers fail them here? As I understand it, AT&T's primary banker on this deal was Greenhill, a smaller boutique M&A firm. These are the kinds of guys I cheer for, everything else being equal, but it really seems like they've been outmaneuvered on this merger.

As with any of these deals, this one is far from over. We're likely still in the early innings and I suspect we'll see some restructuring to appease the DOJ in order to get this deal done. Both sides seem to want that, although it seems clear that T-Mobile would get the better end of a breakup.

Speaking of innings, today we learned that David Einhorn has pulled out of his very high-profile bid to rescue the New York Metropolitans from financial disgrace. Oh, the horror! (Sorry, that was a cheap shot culled from my memory of the days when the Mets shared the National League East with the Cubs). Einhorn says that both he and the Mets had restructured their deal in response to bankers, and he thought they were on the same page. Part of the deal included a commitment on the part of the Mets to deal exclusively with Einhorn for a fixed period of time. As the end of that period approached, Einhorn says he was assured by the Mets' investment bankers that he shouldn't worry about the exclusivity clause because the Mets had not intention of dealing with somebody else. When the clause expired, the Mets did just that.

There is probably a reasonable argument somewhere in there that says that Einhorn was naive to trust the i-bankers, but I guess that's the point here. What's so hard about being a little bit honest, even in business negotiations? Maybe the Mets kept their bankers in the dark and I'm being unfair, but somehow I don't think so. I get that their responsibility is to their client, but that loyalty doesn't preclude honest dealings.

The other thing that strikes me as odd is that, if you're unfamiliar with David Einhorn, he runs a large hedge fund, agitates for management changes when he sees fit, and otherwise wields some influence on Wall Street. It's conceivable that he'll run into these i-bankers again, I would think. The good news for Mets-fan Einhorn is that investing with your heart is usually not a path to high returns. I'm looking at these deals from a pretty high-level perspective. What am I missing? Were these two big fails for investment bankers? Feel free to comment with your thoughts.  One thing is for sure:  if this deal ultimately doesn't happen, it will indeed be a bad week for the bonuses of a whole lot of i-bankers.

* For the sake of full disclosure, and to explain my subtle annoyance over the $3 billion number, the Camelback Fund is long AT&T.

Tags: einhorn, mets, at&t, t-mobile

General Personal Finance | Stocks

E-mail | del.icio.us

Community Banks

Monday, August 29, 2011

Like many Average Joes around the country, I'm not too excited about some of the more esoteric business lines that US Big Banks have pursued in recent years. But that's not the subject of this post.

I feel like I've developed a relatively long list of grievances with big banks over the years.  Some are nitpicky, and some are legit.  I've had good service in getting things resolved at various times, and I've had some maddening experiences.  I thought I'd share what I decided to do about it.

About a year ago I found the passbook from my first savings account, which was housed at a bank in Rogers Park (Chicago) that I think was located at Clark and Lunt, which would be very close to where both my parents were raised.  I might be wrong about the corner, but it was within a few blocks of there.  In any case, I only vaguely remember that bank, and I'll have to dig up the passbook to remember the name.

The first banks I remember "using" are Bell Federal Savings and Loan, and Elk Grove Bank.  Bell likely had a branch in Rogers Park - I really only remember that passbook.  As a kid, I spent some quality time playing around Elk Grove Bank while my Mom did her bank business, and we sometimes got to go visit the herd of transplanted elk across the street.  I think I was more interested in just being in the bank, counting coins, being a kid.  I have fond memories of that place.  Then it was purchased by NBD (parent of National Bank of Detroit), as one result of the relaxing of interstate banking laws that occurred in the eighties(ish).  The mid-90s saw the merger of First Chicago and NBD, which had both grown significantly by then.  I worked downtown in Chicago, and had been banking with First Chicago for a while.  That had become annoying, because they moved people through the branches so quickly that it felt like I had to establish new relationships on a monthly basis.  Probably a good training ground for future bankers, but not great for customers.  In fairness, my banking needs were pretty insignificant, so it never was more than "annoying".  And if i was ever in Elk Grove, there was a branch.  Not long after the First Chicago acquisition, the former Elk Grove Bank became part of Bank One, along with the rest of First Chicago NBD, etc.  It's worth noting at this point that what became First Chicago was one of the very first National banks, as chartered under the National Banking Act during the Civil War.  The Bank One merger marked the first time in over 130 years that "Chicago" was no longer a part of the bank's name.  By now, though, it was a Really Big Bank.  It then was folded into a Really, Really Big Bank:  shortly after the Bank One/First Chicago merger, Chase Manhattan and JP Morgan merged, and the resulting JP Morgan Chase ultimately bought Bank One in 2004.  Chase's commercial banking headquarters sits in Chicago, in the  building that once only housed the First National Bank of Chicago.

Admittedly, I've meandered way off course, here, but I'm not editing, because I think my wandering monologue is instructive in terms of showing how far some banks have traveled from serving the immediate community.  My point isn't that the reality is good or bad for society or anything so grandiose, just that it's our reality.  Hang with me.

Around the time of the Bank One/First Chicago deal, my wife and I moved to Texas.  If I recall correctly, Texas' banking laws were such that Bank One Texas and Bank One Illinois were very distinct, and we had to open new accounts and such, so we chose the bank that was closest to our new house, which wasn't part of Bank One.  That particular giant bank just received a sizable capital injection from a very noteworthy investor, but I digress.  We had a couple of minor annoyances while down there, but I don't remember the specifics.  What I do remember is that my wife and I decided to move from Texas to Phoenix after a couple of years, and our still relatively new bank - one of the biggest in the US - lost a $55,000 check of ours, putting the closing of our new house in jeopardy.  We pushed hard and escalated and didn't take "I don't know where it is" for an answer, before finally getting the check with less than an hour to spare before closing on the house*.  We then summarily dismissed that institution as our bank of choice.  We've never gone back to them.

Upon moving to Phoenix, we opened accounts with a large western Bank that had no branches in Chicago, but was actually older than First Chicago.  Along with the other behemoths we had worked with, this bank has grown into a powerhouse through acquisitions and better balance sheet management than many of its peers.  I have to admit that most of my experience has been positive, and we've had a "VIP" kind of relationship with them since we've been in Arizona that has meant low fees and reasonable service.  Mostly, I don't interact with humans.  The past couple of years, however, have brought on an incessant stream of "accidental" fees being assessed to our account.  Typically, it's a monthly charge for the supposedly free VIP (not the real acronym!) relationship.  But sometimes it's something else.  Every month I call, and every month the fees are refunded without question.  That in itself is suspicious.  It's worth noting that I'm often transferred to a different department, and sometimes told that I have to go into a branch to get something reversed.  I usually hang up and call back, and get an answer that works better for me.  Nobody ever pushes back on my assertion that I'm entitled to a refund.  It's just annoying that a) I get charged these things in the first place when I never had been charged before, b) I often get bounced around the phone before I can get resolution, and c) I'm forced to wonder if this is a new revenue center for the bank.

So where is all of this leading?  Before I answer that, let's look back at the account that I closed in the bank that was the successor to my original Elk Grove Bank.  I left several hundred dollars in the account when I closed it, and asked that they send me a check.  They didn't close the account, and I think I lost track of the status for a while after we moved.  Instead of sending me a check, they started deducting monthly fees from my account because I didn't have the requisite balance to avoid fees.  Of course, I had requested account closure on multiple occasions, so it didn't make sense for me to have any balance.  Eventually, the account went negative, and I got ornery.  Things had become Kafkaesque.  I figured out the email address of the bank's high-profile CEO and sent him an email asking him to fix the situation.  I didn't bother with a detailed explanation.  I used the words "embarrassing" and "absurd", which were almost euphemisms at that point.  He forwarded the message to a member of his executive office, who replied to me the same day, credited me the fees, and closed the account.  It took several years, but they move quickly in the CEO office.  It's probably worth noting that I now have mortgages on a couple of investment properties with this bank, and that has gone smoothly.  Their presence in both Chicago and Phoenix is a selling point.  I went back to the former Bank of Elk Grove to open an account to make life easier for me whenever I'm in Chicago, and it was a good move.

Back to the point.  After calling my primary Big Western Bank for the third or fourth month in a row to have errant fees reversed, I decided it was time to consider my options.  I had been dealing with huge banks for many years, and thought it was worth trying a smaller bank.  I don't want to sound overly naive or nostalgic (especially because this era must predated me), but the corner bank used to take deposits and lend money for local businesses and houses, and they generally actually knew their customers.  Big Banks have their purpose, but that isn't what I need.  So I did some research and opened a rewards checking account with Arizona Bank and Trust.  At the time I think they had two branches, and they now have a whopping six, after the bank troubles of recent years.  I'm paid over 3% on my checking account (subject to various requirements and limitations), and I pay no extra fees for anything, really.  I even go into the branch with some regularity, and don't worry about getting charged for using the teller too many times.  If I withdraw money at an ATM that is not at one of their six branches, they refund whatever fees I've paid.  They're also affiliated with a big network of ATMs.  But the thing that prompted me to write this post occurred just recently.  Not too long ago, my wife started a new job and set up direct deposit with her employer.  The first few checks hit the account a day or two after they were due.  That was weighing on me, because I'd never seen a late direct deposit, and I was kind of wondering if I should be worried about the cash flow of this mid-sized public company, which didn't make much sense.  In any case, her most recent check didn't show up for a couple of days, so I had her call the payroll department.  They thought it might be a  routing number issue, which it could not have been since the other checks had hit the account.  They verified the account number, and I realized that two numbers were juxtaposed.  I called the bank, and the very person who answered the phone said "oh yeah, Kevin, I saw that this morning and it's on my desk."  Huh?  She found it, fixed it, and I saw the money in our account less than an hour later.  They had manually routed the funds to our account the previous 2 or 3 times.  This was exactly my objective when I decided to hook up with a community bank.  She didn't even have to make a call to track the issue down!

I’m not saying this is the best route for everyone.  The retail branches of the Big Banks have an extensive reach, and I think that is valuable for a lot of people.  They also tend to have very good web interfaces, because they have a lot of money to invest in technology, and there’s a lot of value in that.  Nonetheless, I couldn’t be happier with my decision to trade the slick online banking interface for a serviceable one that comes with strong, personal customer support and zero fees.

* You may be wondering why we didn't just delay the closing of the house.  This occurred over 12 years ago, in a much different real estate market.  We had been building a house in Phoenix for 8 months, and most of that time was spent waiting on a framing crew.  There was so much building going on that we had no real idea when the process would be complete, so we started our second Phoenix home search and bought an existing home a few blocks from where we had been building.  That was the home on which we were closing.  Clearly, the check wasn't lost forever, but missing our closing could very well have meant moving to Phoenix without a place to live.  If they had found the check a day later, we may have been looking at starting a third search, and neither of us was very excited about that prospect.

Tags: community banks

Banking | General Personal Finance

E-mail | del.icio.us

Mayhem and Your Emergency Fund

Monday, August 22, 2011

Chances are you've seen the relatively new Allstate commercials featuring Dean Winters as "Mayhem". Great campaign - it's both entertaining and highly effective in terms of getting the point across. The commercials also underscore the fact that the world is full of unexpected financial setbacks, and good financial planning can help. Specifically, it pays to have adequate auto insurance and an emergency fund to negate the need to scramble to pay an unexpected deductible. You know, in case your daughter's BFF kisses Johnny.

To be clear...I'm a fan of these ads, but this post is not an endorsement of Allstate Insurance Company.

Tags: emergency fund, mayhem

Emergency Fund | General Personal Finance | Insurance

E-mail | del.icio.us
<< Previous posts
 

HOME | SERVICES | ABOUT US | FAQ | CLIENT FORMS | NEWS | DISCLOSURES | BLOG © 2008 FOOTHILLS FINANCIAL PLANNING, INC WEBSITE DESIGN AND PRODUCTION BY GLENDALE DESIGNS