logo
Welcome to Foothills Financial Planning, Inc.

  • 529 Plans
  • Banking
  • Berkshire Hathaway
  • College Savings
  • Credit
  • Debt
  • Emergency Fund
  • Estate Planning
  • Fiduciary Standard
  • Financial Advisor Compensation
  • General
  • General Personal Finance
  • Gift Tax
  • Health Savings Accounts
  • Investing
  • IRA
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement Planning
  • Spending
  • Stocks
  • Taxes
  • 2010
    • July (2)
    • June (3)
    • May (3)
    • April (2)
    • March (5)
    • February (4)
    • January (3)
  • 2009
    • December (1)
    • November (4)
    • October (2)
    • September (6)
    • August (2)
    • July (2)
    • June (2)
    • May (3)
    • April (3)
    • March (5)
    • February (4)
    • January (1)
  • 2008
    • December (2)
    • November (1)
    • September (1)
  • 2007
    • September (1)
    • February (2)
  • 2006
    • November (1)
    • September (1)
    • August (1)
    • January (1)
  • 2005
    • December (2)

Health Savings Account contribution limits for 2010

Monday, September 28, 2009

The 2010 contribution and deductible limits for Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) are outlined in the below table.  For 2010, single insureds can contribute up to $3,050 to their HSAs, and those with families can contribute $6,150.  The High-deductible health plans associated with the HSAs must require a minimum deductible of $1,200 and $2,400, respectively, with a maximum out-of-pocket expenditure of $5,950 and $11,900.

  Single   Family
Maximum Contribution limits 2009 2010   2009 2010
Contributions $  3,000 $  3,050   $    5,950 $  6,150
Catch-up contribution $  1,000 $  1,000   $    1,000 $  1,000
           
Deductible limits for HDHPs          
Minimum Deductible $  1,150 $  1,200   $    2,300 $  2,400
Maximum out-of-pocket $  5,800 $  5,950   $  11,600 $  11,900

Tags: hsa, health savings accounts

Health Savings Accounts

E-mail | del.icio.us

Invest at a high rate of return - a simple illustration

Thursday, September 24, 2009

In two previous posts I illustrated the value of investing early and often.  Specifically, the earlier you start an investment plan, the more time it has to compound and grow into wealth.  More obviously, the more that is invested, the more there is to grow.  This illustration also demonstrates the power of compounding, by showing the difference between averaging a 7% rate of return over a long period of time, versus achieving a 10% rate of return.  The point is not to suggest that these rates of return represent two specific asset classes.  It merely shows how dramatically a 3% difference in average returns affects a long-term investment plan.  We’ll build on these themes in future posts when we discuss appropriate levels of risk.

7% vs 10% compounding illustration

Tags:

General Personal Finance | Retirement Planning

E-mail | del.icio.us

61% of US workers are living paycheck to paycheck

Monday, September 21, 2009

According to a nationwide survey that has just been released by CareerBuilder, 61% of workers always or usually live paycheck to paycheck.  What is more astounding to me is that the figure was 49% last year and 43% in 2007.  That is a tremendous change in two years.  Even 30% of six-figure earners live in this manner.

It’s not surprising that more people have been forced to manage in this fashion given the recent economy, but the magnitude of that change is significant.  Our aggregate savings rate in the US has increased over the past couple of years.  No doubt, interest rate resets on mortgages and credit cards have played a role.

Regardless of the reasons for this shift, it is important to note that living without a financial safety net is a pretty dicey way to manage personal finances.  Unemployment is high and may continue to rise for a little while.  Maintaining an emergency fund is critical to financial well-being, even in prosperous times for the general economy.  For some thoughts on building an emergency fund, review my Keep it simple blog post from February.

Tags:

General Personal Finance | Spending

E-mail | del.icio.us

Invest often - a simple illustration

Monday, September 14, 2009

In my last post, I showed the power of starting to invest for retirement at age 25 versus age 35.  This time, we’ll look at the value of investing “a lot” rather than “a little” over a long period of time.  Specifically, the hypothetical 25 year-old who invests $2k per year until retirement at age 65 will end up with about $518k, assuming an average rate of return of 8%.  On the other hand, the investor who puts away $10k per year over the same time period will have almost $2.6m.

2k-vs-10k-compounding-illustration

Tags:

General Personal Finance | Retirement Planning

E-mail | del.icio.us

Invest early - a simple illustration

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

I posted about this several years ago, but I think it bears repeating. It is pretty much a cliche at this point to say that the earlier one starts to invest for retirement, or anything else for that matter, the better. The following chart illustrates the point. An investor that invests $10k per year at an average rate of 8% starting at age 35 will have about $1.13m at age 65. If that investor had started at age 25, he or she would instead have almost $2.6m at retirement. Which investor would you rather be?

25-vs-35-compounding-illustration

Tags: invest early

General Personal Finance | Retirement Planning

E-mail | del.icio.us

Per stirpes

Wednesday, September 02, 2009

If you’ve never come across the term per stirpes, you can probably ignore this post.  However, several people have asked me in the past couple of weeks what it means, so I thought I’d provide an explanation here, in English.  The Latin per stirpes is sometimes called right of representation distribution, and it is used in estate planning documents to describe how estate distributions are allocated if an estate beneficiary predeceases (dies before) the deceased person for whom the estate is being distributed.

The following simple example should illustrate the point.  John has two children, George and Tom, each of whom also has two children of his own.  George and Mary are the only beneficiaries named in John’s will, and John wishes each of them to receive half of John’s estate.  In an unfortunate accident, George dies before John.  Under per stirpes distribution, when John dies 50% of his estate will be distributed to Mary, and 50% will be distributed to George’s two children.

That’s it.  Don’t let the Latin complicate things.  Of course, knowing what it means and applying it are not the same thing.  It’s usually a good idea to talk to your estate planning attorney or advisor for all planning purposes.

Tags:

Estate Planning

E-mail | del.icio.us
 

HOME | SERVICES | ABOUT US | FAQ | CLIENT FORMS | NEWS | DISCLOSURES | BLOG © 2008 FOOTHILLS FINANCIAL PLANNING, INC WEBSITE DESIGN AND PRODUCTION BY GLENDALE DESIGNS